Former U.S. President Donald Trump has stated that while he believes his plan for the Gaza conflict is a strong and effective one, he will not impose it but merely recommend it. Speaking on the issue, Trump emphasized that his proposal aims to bring stability and resolution to the ongoing crisis but ultimately leaves the decision-making to the involved parties.

Trump’s statement comes at a time of heightened tensions in the Middle East, with continued violence and humanitarian concerns in Gaza. Although he did not provide specific details of his plan, he expressed confidence in its effectiveness. However, he also clarified that he would not enforce it as a mandatory solution, respecting the sovereignty of the nations and leaders involved.

His remarks suggest that, if elected president again, his administration would take an advisory role rather than dictating terms to Israel, Palestine, or other stakeholders. This stance aligns with Trump’s broader foreign policy approach of pushing for strong U.S. influence while avoiding direct intervention where possible.

The statement has sparked mixed reactions. Supporters see it as a diplomatic and pragmatic approach, while critics argue that a stronger U.S. stance may be necessary to ensure lasting peace. As the situation in Gaza remains critical, the extent of Trump’s influence on future policy decisions remains uncertain.